![]() Maps calculated using distinct multi‐echo combination methods in the numerical phantom simulations. For the Susc‐TGV‐wAvg pipeline, approximate timings are reported because image reconstruction was performed using first Neurodesk (QSM calculation at each TE) and then MatLab (multi‐echo combination) Mapping, as optimizing this step was outside the scope of the present study. The time reported for the SNR‐wAvg pipeline does not include the time required for The table shows the time required to run each pipeline for the numerical phantom simulations and data acquired in vivo. The location of these ROIs is shown in the χ (B) and T 2 * maps (C) of the numerical phantom u.), T 2 * in ms and χ in parts per million (ppm) assigned to various ROIs in the numerical phantom are shown in (A). Noise propagation in the Susc‐wAvg pipelineįigure S1. ![]() ![]() Noise propagation from the local field to the susceptibility map Noise in total field map calculated by fitting ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |